Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12)

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 22:37:13 10/26/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 26, 2002 at 22:37:59, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On October 26, 2002 at 07:41:41, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>No collision errors if the 64 bits are stored in the table.
>
>That *might* be true if you had a perfect hash key generation algorithm, where
>each pawn formation mapped to exactly 1 hash key, but that is not the case.
>
>Russell


I'm wasn't talking about collisions in general. I'm talking about collision
*errors* where 1 pawn structure is mistaken for another. When you stated, "It
makes me wonder if there are ever *errors* caused by this" is what I addressing.

• Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Dann Corbit 21:46:03 10/27/02
  • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Ricardo Gibert 22:54:35 10/27/02
    • Re: 0x88 vs 144 (or 12x12) Dann Corbit 11:28:41 10/28/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.