Author: Mike S.
Date: 22:53:11 10/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2002 at 09:16:57, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >(...) Nevertheless, after thinking twice, I agree that this result looks a bit >peculiar. Maybe many games were lost on time? The configuration with Auto232 on 1 single computer is unusual. In my test, Genius 98 (~5/6/6.5 AFAIK) achieved a result of [305], very similar to i.e. Aristarch 4, CSTal 2.03 or even Yace 0.99.56 in these tactical positions. And the other abilities of Genius are certainly not worse than it's tactics. Ruffian 1.0.1 is [373], between Nimzo 8 and Hiarcs 7.32 in that test. http://meineseite.i-one.at/PermanentBrain/quick/quickxls.zip But OTOH, maybe the positional part of the WM-Test(100) indicates that the extreme result isn't to unlikely: In the positional part of that test with 36 pos., Ruffian solved 22 - and Genius 6.5 solved only 7!! http://www.computerschach.de/test/WM-Test%20(100pos).zip Regards, Michael Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.