Author: Ingo Lindam
Date: 15:25:32 10/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2002 at 18:01:30, José Carlos wrote: > There's a difference between: > a) my knowledge doesn't fit the position (ie no open lines where I have a >bonus for open lines). > b) the sum of weights is zero (I have one open line and my opponent has one >open line). > > In the first case, you're right that zero eval is misleading and dangerous. > In the second, the position is probably balanced (if this applies to many >parameters, of course, not just one), so the zero is correct. You are right about that difference... but I want to give you a realistic example for the programm evaluate near 0 for the few things he can evaluate...and another 0 for all the things it doesn't know anything about. My problem still isn't solved. You wouldn't play towards a position you just know it is ballanced in the aspect of open files, but in all the other aspects you can't judge it at all, would you?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.