Author: Nagendra Singh Tomar
Date: 23:00:06 10/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2002 at 01:48:02, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On October 28, 2002 at 01:17:41, Nagendra Singh Tomar wrote: > >>What all reasons can you think of for a ply 'n+1' searching lesser nodes than >>ply 'n' search. >> >>regds >>tomar > >The most obvious is a ply n search had really bad move ordering that gets much >improved for ply n+1 thanks to the hash moves saved in the hash table. correct. One more reason can ne that 'n' was just small enough to deny null-move. null-move in 'n+1' ply search saved a lot of nodes.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.