Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 06:43:15 10/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2002 at 15:13:22, James T. Walker wrote: >Since I first tested Ruffian at 5/0 vs Fritz and it didn't do very good, some >here have said it's much better at longer time controls. So far I have only 9 >games at G/30 and Ruffian is leading Junior 7 by 6-3! Ruffian is running inside >the Shredder Classic GUI as an UCI engine and Junior 7 in it's own GUI. Both >using auto232 and their own books and 128 M hash. This little score alone makes >more testing mandatory. I have had problems with Ruffian not finishing games. >It has a tendency to stop playing in the endgame after missing a move from it's >opponent. I get a "ding" and Ruffian has not received the opponents move. I >hope this is fixed in the future. >Jim Would it be safe to infer that Ruffian would be better at automatic overnight post-mortem analysis of a game than Fritz is? Typically, I allow five minutes per move for overnight analyses. [1 GHz Pentium, 1 GB RAM] That is my primary use for Fritz nowadays. I also use fritz to check my analyses, but most any engine might suffice for that. [The overnight analyses are useful to keep the GMs honest when they write chess books.] Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.