Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 09:07:03 10/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2002 at 18:46:33, Harald Faber wrote: >On October 29, 2002 at 12:01:07, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>More about these two matches with autoplayer on two machines by Harald Faber and >>the games can be found at >>http://www.harald-faber.de/englisch/HaraldE.htm >>I think this is somewhat a confirmation that CM9_Utz12n is a rather strong >>setting. In our 13 matches (40'/40) over 30 games, we got an overall score of 62 >>%. >>Regards >>Kurt > > >Remember that the results of CM9000 default and CM9000 Utz12n have been played >with the once called "outdated" Kostick-book! >In my preparations for the tourney in Thueringen beginning in two weeks I admit >I was a bit shocked by the excellent CM9000 Utz12n results because I will >probably have to play against it (like vs. DeepFritz 7 also). But it looks like >ChessTiger 15 gambit aggressive is better against CM9000 Utz12n, currently >7.0-4.0 in favour of Tiger. So my hopes rise again. ;) > >(Of course I will keep further results and especially games from my Thueringen >preparation secret :)) Hi Harald In the so far published 13 matches (40'/40) over 30 games, GambitTiger2 was the only program that had a positive score vs CM9_Utz12n. A positive result of ChessTiger15 gambit aggressive would therefore be no surprise. Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.