Author: stuart taylor
Date: 19:11:08 10/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2002 at 13:03:54, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >On October 31, 2002 at 12:42:38, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>On October 31, 2002 at 12:18:51, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >> >>>On October 31, 2002 at 12:11:50, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>> >>>[D]5r2/r3Npkp/3pn1p1/qbnNp2P/1p2P3/5P2/PP1QB1P1/1KR4R w - - 0 1 >> >>Without using a chess engine, but knowing that a sac is required: >> >>Qh6+ seems to be the most dramatic sac available. >> >>Bob D. > > >Hi Bob, >That the problem with Stuart's request. When you _know_ it is a sac, _and_ that >it is _extraordinary_, everything crystallizes out automatically. >Without fore-knowledge it becomes a real problem seeing that the sac is sound. > >/Matthias. I mean, something requiring such deep vision that most combinative thinkers would not even see the warning signs. Not necesarily mating, and whether or not you know there is something to look for. S.T.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.