Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:36:03 11/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2002 at 10:10:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 01, 2002 at 09:49:29, Rafael Vasquez wrote: > >>NT > >If some program on 486 can beat GambitTiger on A1200 with the result 10-0 then >it really deserves the word genius. > >For some reason I guess that the pgn is correct and the opponent was palm genius >and losing 10-0 against an old program is a bad result for the new genius >and it suggest that the software of palm genius is not better than the old >genius1. > >Uri Something is wrong. The PGN shows genius vs genius. Not Tiger. Also the PGN shows 486 vs palm...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.