Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:04:12 11/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2002 at 10:36:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 01, 2002 at 10:10:08, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 01, 2002 at 09:49:29, Rafael Vasquez wrote: >> >>>NT >> >>If some program on 486 can beat GambitTiger on A1200 with the result 10-0 then >>it really deserves the word genius. >> >>For some reason I guess that the pgn is correct and the opponent was palm genius >>and losing 10-0 against an old program is a bad result for the new genius >>and it suggest that the software of palm genius is not better than the old >>genius1. >> >>Uri > > > > > >Something is wrong. The PGN shows genius vs genius. Not Tiger. > >Also the PGN shows 486 vs palm... I know I said that I believe that the pgn is correct and not the title. losing 10-0 is clearly a bad result for the new palm genius when the opponent is only old Genius1 on 486. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.