Author: Slater Wold
Date: 04:26:10 11/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2002 at 20:05:12, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On November 01, 2002 at 12:10:25, Brian Richardson wrote: > >>On November 01, 2002 at 05:14:10, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>> >>>http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1641&p=6 >> >>Fine, but this was a database test with a workload that looks nothing like >>computer chess. >> >>My dual AMD shows Crafty SMP scalability efficiency of only about 1.4x and >>others have posted Xeon SMP results like 1.8 or 1.9, IRRC > >Brian, you aren't using a good binary.. most floating around are pretty slow. >Get some of the AMD SMP binaries off my page, they provide a good 1.7x speedup >in Crafty on dual AMD systems. > >http://speedycpu.dyndns.org/crafty/ Most I've ever gotten was 1.64. But it is better than most.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.