Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:49:43 11/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2002 at 15:23:48, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 01, 2002 at 14:22:10, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>Sorry, after I wrote previous message, I remembered about parallel >>non-determinism, so I re-run the tests 5 times on the same system and calculated >>average. >> >>mt=2: times are 42, 43, 39, 40, 38, average is 40. >>mt=2: times are 36, 31, 37, 29, 38, average is 34. >> >>So average speedup is even greater than I estimated earlier, something like >>~15%. > >According to those numbers, the speedup is 18% with a (2sd standard error) >margin of 15%. > >With this error margin, it is somewhat premature to talk about 'double >digit' figures. > >-- >GCP I think the point being that Vincent's post was pure nonsense. SMT _does_ provide a speed-up. Not a slow-down as Vincent claimed... That is where this nonsense started. I have a dual PIV/2.2 here, I had already tested on it. Which is what makes me wonder why Vincent has to post things that are absolutely and provably wrong, every time...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.