Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 15:08:49 11/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2002 at 17:49:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I think the point being that Vincent's post was pure nonsense. SMT _does_ >provide a speed-up. Not a slow-down as Vincent claimed... I'm quite surprised it does, in fact. I wouldn't have expected parrallel_efficiency * smt_speedup to have equalled something more than 2. How come SMT is efficient, at all? I have a basic understanding what it is but I don't get why it'd work in a chessprogram at all. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.