Author: stuart taylor
Date: 15:40:22 11/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2002 at 08:57:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote:* >Individual statistics: > >(1) The King 3.23 Utz12n : 390 (+170,=140,- 80), 61.5 % > >Aristarch 4.4 : 30 (+ 17,= 9,- 4), 71.7 % >Crafty 18.15 : 30 (+ 17,= 9,- 4), 71.7 % >Chess Tiger 14 : 30 (+ 11,= 14,- 5), 60.0 % >Fritz 7008 : 30 (+ 9,= 15,- 6), 55.0 % >Gambit Tiger 2 ag : 30 (+ 7,= 12,- 11), 43.3 % >Hiarcs 7.32 : 30 (+ 11,= 12,- 7), 56.7 % >Hiarcs 8 : 30 (+ 11,= 11,- 8), 55.0 % >Junior 7 : 30 (+ 15,= 3,- 12), 55.0 % >List 4.61 : 30 (+ 14,= 13,- 3), 68.3 % >Nimzo 7.32 : 30 (+ 15,= 11,- 4), 68.3 % >Ruffian 1.0.1 : 30 (+ 13,= 13,- 4), 65.0 % >Shredder 6.02 : 30 (+ 14,= 8,- 8), 60.0 % >Yace 0.99.56 : 30 (+ 16,= 10,- 4), 70.0 % >****************** >Kurt Might it be that Gambit Tiger aggressive would do AS good or better against the same opposition, seeing that it is that which beats CM9K utz? Or is the utz more ballanced than that GT style, therefore greater overall? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.