Author: Peter Berger
Date: 16:47:10 11/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2002 at 18:12:26, Bob Durrett wrote: >>>: ) : ) : ) : ) : ) : ) : ) : ) : ) : ) : ) : ) >>> >>>Bob D. >>> >> >>That's a Turing Test and there is nothing funny about it IMHO. I don't know how >>good and professional the "Cheater Cops" at ICC do their job but if you really >>managed to let everybody believe that your chessengine is a human player of >>course this would mean that your engine really plays human-like IMHO. >> >>Peter > >I know the Turing Test is Sacred among AI people. It is absolutely taboo to say >anything bad about it. However, it is fatally flawed! It falsely assumes that >the human mind is the ultimate thinking machine. Typical of the human ego to >think that! How has that anything to do with what I posted? I don't think there is any chessprogram that can really emulate a strong human chessplayer so that it will fool a reasonable amount of humans at expert level, that's it. That's all I posted , that's all I wanted to discuss. > >As an aside: Would you say that a lightning bolt did not exist if no one saw or >heard it? As I don't even know what a lightning bolt is, that is beyond my abilities.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.