Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:09:19 11/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2002 at 18:08:49, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: My results are reproduced by many. Just take a look at anandtech for example. It gave a slowdown there. >On November 02, 2002 at 17:49:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I think the point being that Vincent's post was pure nonsense. SMT _does_ >>provide a speed-up. Not a slow-down as Vincent claimed... > >I'm quite surprised it does, in fact. I wouldn't have expected >parrallel_efficiency * smt_speedup to have equalled something >more than 2. > >How come SMT is efficient, at all? I have a basic understanding >what it is but I don't get why it'd work in a chessprogram at all. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.