Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 01:27:36 11/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2002 at 04:14:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 03, 2002 at 21:47:36, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >No, goliath has not an extra piece > >Tiger win the piece by the combination that you posted but the material is equal >and I do not see the +2 score for white. > >I think that it is better not to use some stupid personality that is not the >default Rebel for analysis. > >The real score after 26.Rb8 Kd8 27.Rxc8+ Kxc8 28.Qxe6+ Rd7 29.Qxg8+ Kc7 is close >to 0.00 and 30.Rb1 is suggested. > >It seems that all the moves in the first game are book moves and I think that >it is a mistake and it is better to have smaller books for long time control >because the program has better chances to find by search better moves. > >Uri Thanks for your comments, Uri. I think I will post some analysis from a default Rebel later tonight. Is the 0.0 score from your program movei? I think you are right about the bookmoves, especially in a correspondence game maybe a program should have built in an routine to check some bookmoves. You could add a comment in your book for a bookmove that may not be best, and search those at really long timecontrols especially if there is just a fixed time per move to search. That kind of comment could be helpful for a human using a program for analysis too, but it would be helpful for the opposition camp bookmakers as well in a commercial book... Regards, Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.