Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 12:03:12 09/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 1998 at 16:46:15, Moritz Berger wrote: >... I bet all the upcoming reviews will complain about this: "We would have >liked to tell our readers about playing strength improvements, but we can't. >Why? Because Ed Schröder wants us to do spend 300 hours (time required for about pah. a tester who needs autoplayer games for giving playing strength judgements is a bad tester... >40 tournament games) of manual testing and we simply cannot do this. In our >opinion, this shows a disrespect of our work as independent journalists because >Ed Schröder wants us to rely solely on his own assesment about the expected >gains.". How about this? Pah ! This is nonsense. In the dedicated time nobody had autoplayers. And nobody had the feeling that there is a disrespect. You are dreaming... >But Rebel is clearly *less* without auto232. Even MUCH less, to me. And ? Thank Matthias. He is in charge. Do you have forgotten this ? Seems so. >I do not think that your demand to remove *all* Rebel games from the SSDF list >is justified. In fact, I believe it's very much unfair. Reasons: It is not a question of fairness. I don't see how you can decide about fairness :-)) it is a question of copyrights and licencing products for usage. >Hey, come on Ed, you really have nothing to hide ... Rebel's playing strength is >beyond any doubt for me, don't spoil the fun by disabling the transmission of >Rebel's mating moves via auto232 ... > >Moritz Hey ChessBase, come on, you have nothing to hide... :-))) Or ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.