Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:22:13 11/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2002 at 08:37:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 04, 2002 at 08:16:16, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 03, 2002 at 21:43:45, Eelco de Groot wrote: >> >>>On November 03, 2002 at 13:16:40, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>For anyone interested; >>>> >>>>Little Goliath 2000 V3.9,A on XP 2200+ at 45 mins move. >>>>Using Fritz 8.ctg >>>> >>>>ChessTiger 15 normal on AMD at 1400 mhz at 60 mins move. >>>> >>>>http://www.andreas-schwartmann.de/corrchess/ >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>> >>>Hello people, >>> >>>Nice idea Andreas, Sarah. Tiger 15 seems to be having have a comfortable >>>position as White in game one? >>> >>>[D]2b1k1r1/r7/p1p1p2Q/2b1p3/q1P5/1R1B2P1/P7/5R1K w - - >>> >>>Analysis by Rebel personality Q5T, codename "Trick or Treat" >>> >>>05:49 10.00 2.03 26.Rb8 Kd8 27.Rxc8+ Kxc8 28.Qxe6+ >>> Rd7 29.Qxg8+ Kc7 30.Qg6 Qxa2 31.Rb1 >>> Bb6 32.Bf5 (316) >>> >>>I can only see game one on the page, maybe this game was already given up by >>>Goliath and game two is now in progress? >> >>Both games are in progress. Below the board diagram is a slider for which game. >> >>In the game in question, Tiger was still in book before Ra7 and played Rb8 score >>+ 0.57 at depth 17. >> >>Sarah. > >I think that the book that tiger used is bad for correspondence game. >If Tiger does not win the game then it seems that I am right. > >I think that it is a mistake to include in book lines when a lot of pieces are >traded and there is not a forced win. Maybe you could share with Jeroen those book lines that lead to a forced win?;-) Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.