Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 23:46:04 11/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2002 at 19:06:28, Sune Fischer wrote: >On November 04, 2002 at 18:56:57, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >>>Carefull - at least the knight promotion should be considered. But if the >>>queen-promotion is rejected by capture of the promoted queen, underpromotions >>>make not much sense, because they may captured as well. If a queen promotion >>>forces a stalemate-draw, also rook as well as bishop promotions should be >>>considered. >>> >>>Gerd >> >>nice Testposition: >> >>[D]8/4P3/1P2P3/4b3/8/PNk5/P1p2P2/K5B1 w - - bm f4; Liburkin > >Yes, this is very realistic, I can see why you would care about this position ;) > >-S. On second thought, I don't like for a program to have holes in it, it should be able to solv all problems given enough time. So a little modification to the implementation would be needed. You can probably give me more positions that will fail after the modification, but I think that goes more or less for all pruning rules. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.