Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:49:10 11/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2002 at 14:41:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 06, 2002 at 13:19:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>>Probably the first 7 finishers were above the level of Crafty, even >>>more will be stronger than Comet. >> >>I think that is a _big_ stretch... IMHO of course. Based on _many_ games on >>ICC. > >I'm sure at least ChessTiger, The King, Diep and Deep Sjeng are stronger. >(Diep maybe only at slower games, I'm sure Vincent will gladly >tell us the details) > I would agree about tiger and the king. I would _not_ agree about diep or sjeng or the others. They aren't necessarily weaker, but they certainly aren't stronger. We can test that hypothesis on ICC whenever any of the authors wants, of course. >I'm quite sure the latest Insomniac and Warp are stronger. > >I suspect IsiChess is also stronger, but I haven't seen >enough of that program to make a sound conclusion. > >I don't think ICC games are good indications of strength. I >use it for debugging. I suspect many others do the same. The >tournament versions are a different matter altogether. > Right. So you test something _other_ than a good version on ICC? :) As I said, it is an _easy_ hypothesis to test and toast... >-- >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.