Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 15:44:07 11/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2002 at 18:02:57, Severi Salminen wrote: >>>A good program must be both a quick searcher and a good evaluator. >> >>Tiger14 is not a fast searcher and I guess that the same is for tiger15. >>I do not think that a good program must be a quick searcher. > >"a quick searcher". Please define "quick". What was quick in 1980, is now slow. >But the next holds allways: the faster, the better. "Must not be quick" means >practically nothing. > >Severi The right statement is the deeper the searches the better (Which is not precisely the same as the number of ply's .) Still I think something is wrong with chessprograms on this mather when a program has searched for lets say 12 plys and I make 1 ply the evaluation changes which means the evaluation the program made was wrong) and not the faster. Regards Marc Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.