Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 23:13:25 11/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2002 at 01:38:30, martin fierz wrote: >On November 07, 2002 at 20:43:32, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On November 07, 2002 at 19:48:46, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>So you're kind of building a giant opening book? >> >>Yes and no. It's just a pile of data. It could be used as an opening book, but >>it would be unlikely that such an approach would be successful. > >i would be surprised if such an approach were not successful! my checkers >opening book generator analyses opening positions and somehow decides which >position to analyse next, and this approach works extremly well for checkers. of >course, chess is much more complicated, but if you get 1000s of computers >working for you, and a powerful engine to search with, then this approach will >work for chess too. See what computer programs think about the Evans Gambit. The evaluation is often off by about 2 pawns. On the other hand, if you minimax the same data, it will turn out the bugs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.