Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 08:21:16 11/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2002 at 08:27:29, Terry McCracken wrote: >On November 08, 2002 at 03:50:01, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>>>>On November 08, 2002 at 00:55:34, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>>>On November 07, 2002 at 20:57:10, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>We know that game four was mainly played with one processor due to some >>>>>>technical problem and it wasn't until the very endgame of game four when the >>>>>>game was already in a drawn position that the 8x MP system was utilizing the 8 >>>>>>processors. But how many of you think that Fritz 8 beta could have won >>>>>>the entire match by just playing with a dual MP system, and Why ? >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I believe, they were using Fritz 8 Beta;-) >> >>>>>Terry >> >>Yes they were using Fritz 8 Beta, but do you think that Fritz 8 Beta could have >>won the match by using a Dual MP, since the 8x MP system was having problems >>during some games, in which the match result could have ended with a different >>result. >> >> >>Pichard > >Probably not. I'm disappointed in Kramnik's result, as he demonstrated how >vastly superior he was over the machine, in the first half of the match. > >IMHO, Fritz got Lucky! > >Terry Kramnik only demontrated how superior he was in the endgame stage, but only during the first four games when the program allowed him to trade Queens. Once the program refused to trade Queens Mr. Kramnik became frustraded and didn't showed any advantage over the program, since with the Queens on board the program was still using its tremendous calculating power to beat Kramnik tactically. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.