Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:09:45 11/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2002 at 17:58:30, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 08, 2002 at 16:47:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>It can be continued later today if you want... > >I'll be debugging the parallelism the next few >days and need my computer. We can play another >match another time. Would be nice if something >can be done about the 'rematch' problem as well. > >Actually, I could just try to send you a Linux >compile and book and you can check whether my >mouthing off is warranted or not with much less >hassle. > >-- >GCP If you want to do that I can run the match on a set of quad 550's so that we have equal hardware. I don't think I can give us access to the eg tables over there as I don't have them on my cluster, but I'm not that concerned about them in general. However, I need a bit of time to get things ready to do this myself. And perhaps the option will be to let you run on "plasma" so that you could run directly on ICC using xboard, where you could control everything yourself. I could run on one of the other nodes and hit ICC the same way. As far as your "mouthing off" goes, that's another issue. You claimed that _several_ of the programs there were "better". I've played _way_ too many games vs diep to believe that. I won't say I am a lot better. I will certainly say "I am not worse" from tons of experience... I would expect that a match with your program would be tough. You have repeatedly said that you copied most everything from my eval, and then added some things on your own. No doubt that will make things difficult for me...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.