Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Survey proposal: Importance of Auto232 compatibility

Author: Dan Homan

Date: 07:04:56 09/11/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 11, 1998 at 09:07:13, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>
>Fortunately the winboard/xboard engine protocol is accepted by almost all the
>freeware programs.  Which is a larger number of programs than those supporting
>the archaic auto232 interface.  Perhaps time and numbers will settle this.
>But clearly, auto232 is a poorly designed interface...
>

The standard doesn't have to be winboard/xboard... although this is certainly
convienent, but perhaps the ICS protocol that is supported by xboard/winboard.
Testers could have a FICS server running on their lab network (maybe on an old
486) and just log in the client machines to arrange matches.  The routines
in Robofics practically provide a ICS protocol library - for Unix/Linux
machines at least.  I am not sure how difficult this would be to port to
Win32.  Programs that are xboard/winboard compatitable would automatically
be compliant with the standard through the ICS interface provided by xboard.

I am not sure if the xboard/winboard protocol alone is a good enough standard
because while xboard/winboard does allow an engine to reside on
external machine.... I believe that the external machine must be unix/linux.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong here.

 - Dan





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.