Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:57:51 11/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2002 at 13:26:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 09, 2002 at 11:48:09, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >>On November 09, 2002 at 04:48:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On November 09, 2002 at 01:08:35, Peter Kappler wrote: >>> >>>>On November 09, 2002 at 00:09:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>I would expect that a match with your program would be tough. You have >>>>>repeatedly said that you copied most everything from my eval, and then >>>>>added some things on your own. >>>> >>>> >>>>If this is true, I find it extremely depressing. >>>> >>>>GCP, say it ain't so... >>> >>>Lol, it isn't. >>> >>>What I said was that when I saw a good idea in Crafty >>>that wasn't already in Sjeng, I would not hesitate to >>>'steal' it. >>> >>>I also said I know from looking at your code that there >>>aren't many things Crafty knows that Sjeng doesn't know, >>>but that the reverse isn't true. >>> >>>The above doesn't mean that I copied your eval and >>>added stuff of my own. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>What percentage of your eval is Dr Hyatt's in terms of performance contribution. >>Example you might say that only 10 % of the idea's are Dr Hyatts but that 10 % >>might equate to 50 % of the eval performance, or, the reverse could be the case. >> I think you need to clarify this for your own image ( if that is important to >>you). >>Let's not leave any doubt's about your program authenticity either way. My >>opinion only >>Thanks >>Wayne\ > >the knowledge in crafty is so basic and so very rude and primitif that >you cannot possibly call it 'bobs ideas'. I think that saying that the knowledge of another program is primitive is not polite. I believe that most free programs have less knowledge in their evaluation relative to crafty. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.