Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the Crafty-Sjeng match complete?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:46:19 11/09/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 09, 2002 at 07:23:52, James Swafford wrote:

>On November 09, 2002 at 00:09:45, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>> [snip]  You have
>>repeatedly said that you copied most everything from my eval, and then
>>added some things on your own.  No doubt that will make things difficult
>>for me...
>
>
>Ouch.  You are one step away from calling Sjeng a clone here.
>Are you sure you're quoting him correctly?
>
>Maybe it's fair to say Sjeng is heavily _based_ on Crafty, which
>is not nearly as bad (IMHO) as being a (modified, improved, whatever)
>clone.
>
>--
>James


This is not the same thing as being a clone.  I said exactly what GCP has
said to me in the past...

A clone is a duplicate with a few changes.  Sjeng doesn't use the same kind
of data structures and search that I use.  He simply said he went over the code
and implemented everything that looked useful in his eval.  At one point he
complained about my king safety, wanting me to write something better so he
could use it. We both had a chuckle during the conversation.  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.