Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 20:26:48 11/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2002 at 22:28:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I think Will's point was that if a program kibitzes a score and PV, then >it makes it harder for the human to interfere behind the scenes, and it would >let everyone know what the programs are seeing as well, probably making the >games more interesting to watch. > >I certainly want to see an automatic-only rule. Kibitzing scores and the PV >is also a good idea. (and time). How hard would it be to pull the PV of the other engine from the kibitzed info? That could pose a potentially bigger cheating opportunity. Which do you think would be more detremental? An engine that ALWAYS ponders the correct move, essentially giving double time odds to that engine, or the operator forcing a move here and there?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.