Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:11:16 11/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2002 at 23:26:48, Russell Reagan wrote: >On November 09, 2002 at 22:28:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I think Will's point was that if a program kibitzes a score and PV, then >>it makes it harder for the human to interfere behind the scenes, and it would >>let everyone know what the programs are seeing as well, probably making the >>games more interesting to watch. >> >>I certainly want to see an automatic-only rule. Kibitzing scores and the PV >>is also a good idea. (and time). > >How hard would it be to pull the PV of the other engine from the kibitzed info? >That could pose a potentially bigger cheating opportunity. Which do you think >would be more detremental? An engine that ALWAYS ponders the correct move, >essentially giving double time odds to that engine, or the operator forcing a >move here and there? I don't see how you could use my PV to predict anything. I have already played my move before I kibitz my PV, so how will you use it?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.