Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:54:57 09/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
I have recognized the statements of mark and others too, they had an offensive tone within. Not said straight, but between the lines. What disapoints me enough is that meanwhile I did post computerchess data, they do not refer in ANY way to my data. In opposite they throw with indifferent and offending statements. If they have evidence that THEIR fritz5-power.ctg plays different, why not referring to this. I mean, when I am cheating (as mark implies, or enrique, or whoever), how do i do it ? I can replay the games at any time with my original fritz5.03 (CB-magazin-update) and the original power.ctg from the power-books. Why is it my fault that these lines are in the book. And that the machine plays it, when I let them play manually. I am prepared for accusations of cheating. Whenever i started games with fritz, i had a witness in my home who saw live me operating the 2 machines and input the moves. So when they don't believe that these games happened ONE time and live, i can name the witness. He is known to Dirk Frickenschmidt. And maybe also to others. I thought somebody would accuse me cheating. So i was prepared. Also i can repeat/replay the games by any time. You can reproduce them. What is their problem ?!? That fritz lost ? If this makes the rest of the world cheaters, than many people cheat, because fritz played in paris the same quality, although matthias feist, frans morsch and frederic friedel were there and operated in a team ! If losing fritz=cheated operation, than as a result frederic and frans and matthias have cheated in paris too. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.