Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:28:02 11/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2002 at 12:46:30, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >Vincent, >i have great respect for you and your knowledge, and i would prefere to further >read your computer chess related statements here. > >You started the escalation cycle and now you are harmed: > >>Tournaments in Edmonton organized by Peter Skinner i can't take >>serious though. > >Which obviously hurts Peter Skinner, even if his reply was too crude IMHO. >But that's the way escalation gets it own dymanic. >We all are more or less conceitedness and vulnerable. > >Bob statements: > >"I'm interested in who starts what" >"I don't care what you are referring to" > >implies indeed some contradiction, but is it worth to point that out? What is the contradiction there? (1) the person that starts the problem is the one that needs attention. The responders might need a comment but initiation is the key, IMHO. (2) "I don't care..." was directed at his confused maze of references to threads as though Skinner beat up on him _first_. But this didn't happen and the comments you quoted above make that quite clear. > >Cheers, >Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.