Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Curious

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:00:48 11/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 13, 2002 at 14:38:36, Ed Panek wrote:

>On November 13, 2002 at 14:11:53, Marc van Hal wrote:
>
>>On November 13, 2002 at 13:39:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On November 13, 2002 at 11:37:50, Marc van Hal wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 13, 2002 at 11:27:49, Marc van Hal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 13, 2002 at 11:17:39, Peter Berger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you talking about this one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?264591
>>>>>
>>>>>yes
>>>>>Why is it not on it's original place?
>>>>>Like you see you get misunderstandings in this way
>>>>>Marc
>>>>
>>>>I forgot to mention the harasment it can give for both both party's
>>>>For the poster who later on finds the posting after he behaved himself like a
>>>>fool .
>>>>And the moderation where is getting trowed at without good reasons.
>>>>(Only trying to hide my mistake he he but in fact it's treu.)
>>>>Ok an other apolegy for the moderation anyways.
>>>>Marc
>>>
>>>
>>>Notice there was no "moderation" involved here.
>>>
>>>It is a simple "user error".  Your messages are still there...  You just need to
>>>extend
>>>the filter interval to see them again.
>>
>>Was there something wrong with my apology?
>>Again this is typicaly a programmer eror
>>Thinking if I know it everyone knows it.
>>Gues what your almost always wrong when you think like this
>>There is no manual so it is definitly  not a user mistake.
>>(Talking about crystal balls and Marjuhana he he)
>>In fact you once told me you made the same kind of erors yourself!
>>But I still didn't knew about the time filters.
>>I do know it now so if I repeat this eror then it's a user mistake!
>>
>>Regards
>>Marc
>
>
>Marc,
>
>  I rmember one of my College Profs told me: the way to discern if a statement
>is hostile is to remove it from the text and examine by itself in 2 ways
>
>1) Does the statement (with the offending phrase removed) still make sense?
>2) Does the removed statement alone offend?
>
>The answer to this is yes and yes. Certian authors add unnecessary language to
>insult people.
>
>Ed


I didn't see anything insulting anywhere.  Just an implied criticism about posts
being
removed by moderators for no reason.  Was there something I missed???



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.