Author: David Hanley
Date: 13:52:35 11/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2002 at 12:11:08, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 13, 2002 at 12:06:18, David Hanley wrote: > >>Deep blue played a lot of games. It blew over all the computers ( except >>fritz, one time ) in the ACM contests. It played a lot of GM games and >>matches. > >5 years ago. That means *nothing* today. There is the claim that the DB was no better than other programs at that time. The ACM contests seem to refute that. Also, its record against GM's and world chamoppions was, and still is excellent. Do the current machines do as well? You could argue that. >If you play the current best program on current hardware against that >combination, it's also going to blow it over. Against the kasparov, etc? Well, well see. But i expect that it won't convince either camp. > >>I don't think this put-down of DB is intended as an honest argument. > >Amir has stated this repeatedly, even here, in the past. That doesn't mean it's an honest arguemnt. The fact that program 'a' might reproduce DB move 'b' doesn't mean that 'a' is not better than 'b'. After all, a random chess program will eventually reproduce "the immortal game." dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.