Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:52:09 11/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2002 at 18:49:57, Marc van Hal wrote: >On November 13, 2002 at 17:53:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 13, 2002 at 17:10:27, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>On November 13, 2002 at 15:59:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On November 13, 2002 at 14:11:53, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 13, 2002 at 13:39:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 13, 2002 at 11:37:50, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 13, 2002 at 11:27:49, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On November 13, 2002 at 11:17:39, Peter Berger wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Are you talking about this one? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?264591 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>yes >>>>>>>>Why is it not on it's original place? >>>>>>>>Like you see you get misunderstandings in this way >>>>>>>>Marc >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I forgot to mention the harasment it can give for both both party's >>>>>>>For the poster who later on finds the posting after he behaved himself like a >>>>>>>fool . >>>>>>>And the moderation where is getting trowed at without good reasons. >>>>>>>(Only trying to hide my mistake he he but in fact it's treu.) >>>>>>>Ok an other apolegy for the moderation anyways. >>>>>>>Marc >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Notice there was no "moderation" involved here. >>>>>> >>>>>>It is a simple "user error". Your messages are still there... You just need to >>>>>>extend >>>>>>the filter interval to see them again. >>>>> >>>>>Was there something wrong with my apology? >>>> >>>>I am not sure what you mean. I simply answered your question directly... >>>> >>>>>Again this is typicaly a programmer eror >>>>>Thinking if I know it everyone knows it. >>>> >>>>This has been the way CCC works since it was started. In fact, it is the way >>>>_all_ >>>>of these message-boards work... >>>> >>>>>Gues what your almost always wrong when you think like this >>>> >>>>+I+ didn't make a mistake that I know of. :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>There is no manual so it is definitly not a user mistake. >>>> >>>>It _was_ a user error. You said that a post had been deleted. It had not. You >>>>just didn't know how to see it after it was more than 36 hours old. But that >>>>doesn't make it not a user error... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>(Talking about crystal balls and Marjuhana he he) >>>>>In fact you once told me you made the same kind of erors yourself! >>>>>But I still didn't knew about the time filters. >>>>>I do know it now so if I repeat this eror then it's a user mistake! >>>>> >>>> >>>>It's a mistake, regardless. IE what happens if you run thru a small town and >>>>don't >>>>notice that single 40kph speed limit? You see the blue lights, you get a >>>>ticket, and >>>>you probably pay more attention the next time. But it was still a mistake. >>> >>> >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>The diference between this and my postings is you need to know the trafic rules >>>before driving a car. >>> >>>And how stupid it is you need to know the law >>>(But not even a Judge are a lawer knows all the rules of the law) >>> >>>This rule doesn't count for programs. >>> >>>All Trafic rules are written in a book. >>>But there is not a manual on how this forum works. >> >>Actually there is. This forum uses a normal message-board facility that is used >>by >>many different places. And it is documented. Just not here and not in plain >>sight... >>Unfortunately... >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------ >An other reference to the law is. >It must be available for everyone. >And they also should be informed where to get this knowledge. >This is the rule lawers and judges use all the time. >Ok knowledge about previous cases do help a lot too. >To become a great lawer or judge. \ Actually that is not true. The classic judicial quote is "ignorance is no defense". IE just because you don't _know_ that a law exists, breaking it is still a criminal offense. But, a better quote here would be "don't accuse until you are sure." IE we didn't remove _anything_ as moderators. We are not "out of control" as moderators. We had nothing to do with your problem whatsoever yet we were certainly accused of having done something... >But that's an other story. >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>That is why I said (Cristal balls and Marjuhana) >>> >>>I also could have written with a wet finger. >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>It would have sounded better if you asked "why can't I see my old posts" rather >>>>than "who >>>>deleted them..." >>>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>When your wondering what happened with your post your corect. >>>>Ok it also treu if your not sure if your only wondering if it perhaps might have been a hostile action your corect too. >>>And I was to aggresive. >>>Thats what you get if you become a litle paranoia he he. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.