Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 00:26:47 11/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2002 at 01:47:38, Ron Murawski wrote: [snip] >A computer never knowingly plays a true sacrifice. All it can do is make the >move that will get it the highest score, aka "best move". And that is different to how humans play a sacrifice exactly how? Computers are a bit more number-centric than humans, but that is true for the non-sacrifice-moves as well as the sacrifice-moves. >In order to get an engine to play a knight sacrifice, you must award enough >attacking bonuses to outweigh the loss of the knight. And a human has to see and evaluate the attacking chances too to outweigh the loss of the knight. Again, how is that different? >My own engine attempts to do this and I find that sometimes it works and >sometimes it doesn't. As it does with humans.. just ask Kramnik. ;) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.