Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Much ado about nothing

Author: Detlef Pordzik

Date: 13:44:32 09/12/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 12, 1998 at 11:28:50, Fernando Villegas wrote:

>On September 11, 1998 at 22:55:55, Detlef Pordzik wrote:
>
>>This program never had a " lobby " over here in Germany; in fact, many of
>>the " testers " had nothing better to write about than upsetting themselves
>>on all the possible figures + boards on can use therein.
>>( Useless, nonsense, overloaded...)
>>
>>Without - too - bad thoughts, I really wonder, why a known and well
>>reputated programmer like de Konig never got enough respect for his product
>>and work from SSDF, by the means of being tested on their best, the 200 MMX ?
>>
>>As I spent quite some time on this prog, I'd predict it to be among the top
>>10 for sure then.
>>
>>And :
>>I just read alot about improvements or not from 2.50 - 1 - 2.60 or higher.
>>I wonder, why nobody ever could report - no even experienced Bert - that the
>>program is able to play noticeable different chess - under it's own surface.
>>
>>Have a try with the Kortchnoi or Spassky settings - view the internal engine
>>balances to understand, what I mean.
>>This could astonish some people, I suppose.
>>
>>ELVIS
>
>
>Hi Elvis:
>You know, all the so called "Mass market" programs has been victims of the same
>oblivion. There is a kind of petulance in this issue from the part of us,
>freaks, writers for freaks, etc. It seems that if a program comes well packed,
>full of features and with a very good price, then at once it does not deserve a
>word from the wizards. Power Chess has a wonderful engine by Kittinger and
>rarely something has been written about it. CM has a wonderful engine as you
>say, but the same happens. Do you want to be considered a professional
>programmer? Then you must deliver an horrible package at 100 bucks or more; then
>you will be considered seriously...
>Fernando

Hi Fernando -
I understand quite well, what you mean - as I'm one of " us " freaks.....since
the early eightees - but never make much romour 'bout this.
USCF chess - also with a brilliant engine from Dave, is an exellent MOTOR, as
well - with quite some internal, strange behaviour.....

See : for...me....it ain't so important, weather a thing comes along with Mickey
Mouse figures or something - as long as I can change the GUI to what I consider
as normal.
I wanna do researches on the quality of the engine. That's basically for me.

You aren't in the scene since yesterday - and so you know as good as me - that
Johan did respectfull work on several progs - the wonderfull R 30..or - CM.

he's just following a different path than Marty, for example, or Ed or Richard.
But that shouldn't keep U S - as we consider ourselves supported with enough
experience + knowledge...away from accepting this.....mass market selling route
 - as long as the prog shows itself as worthy - on CHESS strenght ?

Ain't that right ?

Pleasant w/e

ELVIS



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.