Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No...

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 07:02:47 11/14/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 14, 2002 at 03:07:26, Daniel Clausen wrote:

>On November 13, 2002 at 22:08:58, andrew tanner wrote:
>
>>On November 13, 2002 at 22:00:06, Russell Reagan wrote:
>>
>>>My post had nothing to do with politics, religion, or any human prejudice, so it
>>>doesn't belong there. At least here I'm half on topic with the "chess" part of
>>>computer chess.
>>
>>I agree. that forum has changed into something other than "chess thinking"
>
>It's not CCCs problem, if the CTF forum turns into something else than what it
>used to be.
>
>Sargon

It may be too late now, but judicious moderating would have kept CTF on chess.
That didn't happen.  Since CTF is very popular, I don't see getting rid of it.

I would like to see a third icdchess bulletin board which was limited to chess.
However, beggars cannot be choosy.  In other words, the owners of icdchess are
making these bulletin boards available out of the goodness of their hearts.
Maybe they get more sales that way, I don't know.  But the bottom line is that
adding a third forum would be up to the icdchess owners. Can they afford it?
Would doing so help them to get more sales in their store?

Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.