Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:57:19 11/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2002 at 11:26:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 14, 2002 at 03:33:48, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On November 13, 2002 at 16:52:35, David Hanley wrote: >> >>>>If you play the current best program on current hardware against that >>>>combination, it's also going to blow it over. >>> >>>Against the kasparov, etc? Well, well see. But i expect that it won't >convince either camp. >> >>No. DB of then against the top of now. I suspect DB would get spanked. >> >>DB of then against the programs of then is another matter. >> >>-- >>GCP > >I'll change the metaphor a bit, but if by "spanked" you mean that DB's >fist would get beat to a bloody pulp by the faces of today's micros" then >I might agree. > >But _only_ in that metaphorical context. If it's only about metaphors, I think that computer chess is also a topic for me. I have the concrete question if you could give us a comparison from the old days. How would you compare the difference in strength between the actual commercials and DB2 in giving the names of ancient programs? Could we say, CRAY BLITZ against FRITZ 2 or what would you prefer? Rolf Tueschen I
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.