Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:47:56 09/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 1998 at 14:18:08, Hannu Wegner wrote: > >Hi Bob, > >I think a bad autoplayer is better than no autoplayer, don't you think so. In my >opinion it is absolutly great that Stefan wrote the winautoplayer and everybody >can use it. Don't forget that there are more than 20 programs which are >compatible to the auto232-standard. Of course you are right , that the >autoplayer 232 (dos-version) has its mistakes but you can use it! Everybody >would like to see a better solution, but the "bad" autoplayer works. And there >is another very important thing: The Winautoplayer 232 is compatible to the >Chess 232-pcchessboard. There are still people who like to play themself against >these programs (I do). For me this is even more important that the >autoplayercompability. > >I still do not understand why nobody had the idea to make winboard compatible to >the Winautoplayer 232. There would be some more fine possibilities to use the >Chess 232-pc-board. > >I offered you some times allready to make some tests for crafty. If you allready >have a version with the winautoplayer which does not work with the tablebases >why don't you release it anyway? > > >Best greetings, >Hannu Wegner The DOS auto232 interface is really buggy. The windows version may be perfectly fine. My biggest problem with the windows version is that the code becomes part of the engine, when it shouldn't be. IE the auto232 driver should be a separate program that operates just like winboard does under windows. Then it can be changed, enhanced, and no one has to recompile or release a new version of the engine, because the auto232 stuff is not in the engine... That would be the "clean" approach. I haven't fooled with the windows version because I have no way to compile windows code and no way to debug the same. Since winboard and xboard are identical from the engine's point of view, I can test new xboard stuff and know that it will work under windows painlessly. But I really don't want to include windows-specific serial port stuff in my code, I'd rather see that remain separate as in winboard, so that it could support network play as well, without me having to change my engine to handle the network stuff in addition to the serial port stuff... Software engineering: "separation of concerns"... >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.