Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 01:31:11 11/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2002 at 20:15:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >Also JAVA will *never* be as fast as c(++), no *matter* the implementation. Care to elaborate on that? What 'feature of Java' or 'language construct' doesn't allow Java to be as fast as C++? The only thing I can see at the moment is the fact that in Java all methods are virtual, whereas in C++ you can (I'd say 'have to') define which methods are virtual and which are not. But the speed advantage of non-virtual methods is not really that big... (basically it's just one more pointer-indirection) Btw: The speed of Java is not as bad as many believe. But somehow it stays in peoples heads forever, no matter what. Similarly to cookies in web-programming, which will stay 'dangerous' for all time. Sargon
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.