Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: which program - Deep Fritz 7

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 11:25:45 11/15/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 15, 2002 at 13:51:21, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 15, 2002 at 13:22:45, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>On November 15, 2002 at 12:41:19, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>On November 14, 2002 at 22:09:42, martin fierz wrote:
>>>
>>>>i was looking at eduard nemeth's page on computer chess and stumbled across the
>>>>following famous position:
>>>>
>>>>[D]1k6/8/8/8/8/5p1p/PPP5/6K1 w - - 0 1
>>>>
>>>>white is a pawn up but will lose the game. i first saw this position about 20
>>>>years ago when our coach showed it to us as kids - he let us choose which side
>>>>we wanted to play, and we always wanted white of course, being materialistic :-)
>>>>anyway, eduard says on his page that as long as he cared to look, fritz thought
>>>>white was winning. i let fritz7 run over night on my laptop, with the result
>>>>pasted below: it takes fritz over 10 hours on my old P3 450MHz to see that white
>>>>is worse, and after 24 hours the score is not yet showing that white is lost.
>>>>any engines do better on this?
>>>>
>>>>aloha
>>>>  martin
>>>>
>>>>Analysis by Fritz 7:
>>>>
>>>>1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kc6 3.c3 Kd5 4.a5 h2+ 5.Kxh2 Kc6 6.Kg3
>>>>  +-  (3.91)   Depth: 10/18   00:00:00  58kN
>>>>1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kd6 3.c4 Kc6 4.a5
>>>>  +-  (4.06)   Depth: 11/17   00:00:00  73kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  +-  (3.78)   Depth: 12/18   00:00:00  113kN
>>>>1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kc6 3.b5+ Kb6 4.c4 f2+ 5.Kxf2 h2 6.Kg2 h1Q+ 7.Kxh1
>>>>  +-  (3.53)   Depth: 12/18   00:00:00  128kN
>>>>1.a4!
>>>>  +-  (3.81)   Depth: 13/20   00:00:01  191kN
>>>>1.a4!
>>>>  +-  (4.09)   Depth: 13/20   00:00:01  207kN
>>>>1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kc6 3.a5 Kb5 4.c3
>>>>  +-  (4.13)   Depth: 13/20   00:00:01  227kN
>>>>1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kd6 3.a5 Kc6 4.c4
>>>>  +-  (4.34)   Depth: 14/21   00:00:02  344kN
>>>>1.a4 Kc7 2.a5 Kd6 3.b4 Kd5 4.a6 Kc6 5.b5+
>>>>  +-  (4.13)   Depth: 15/26   00:00:03  596kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  +-  (3.84)   Depth: 16/27   00:00:05  1040kN
>>>>1.a4
>>>>  +-  (3.84)   Depth: 16/27   00:00:06  1083kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  +-  (3.56)   Depth: 17/27   00:00:08  1464kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  +-  (3.50)   Depth: 17/28   00:00:10  1671kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  +-  (3.22)   Depth: 18/30   00:00:12  2366kN
>>>>1.a4
>>>>  +-  (3.22)   Depth: 18/30   00:00:13  2471kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  +-  (3.22)   Depth: 19/32   00:00:17  3585kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  +-  (2.94)   Depth: 20/33   00:00:22  5058kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  +-  (1.81)   Depth: 20/33   00:00:26  6126kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  +-  (1.66)   Depth: 21/36   00:00:38  9266kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  +-  (1.66)   Depth: 22/39   00:01:02  16085kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  ±  (1.38)   Depth: 23/40   00:01:34  24793kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  ±  (1.28)   Depth: 23/42   00:02:56  51884kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  ±  (1.25)   Depth: 24/42   00:04:15  74045kN
>>>>1.a4 Kb7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5
>>>>  ±  (1.25)   Depth: 25/44   00:06:46  116088kN
>>>>1.a4 Kc7 2.a5 Kb7 3.b3 Ka6
>>>>  ±  (1.25)   Depth: 26/47   00:19:01  320992kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  ±  (0.97)   Depth: 27/49   00:38:23  644062kN
>>>>1.a4 Ka7 2.a5 Ka6 3.b4 Kb5 4.c3 Ka6 5.c4 Ka7
>>>>  µ  (-1.22)   Depth: 27/51   10:23:09  13057728kN
>>>>1.a4--
>>>>  -+  (-1.50)   Depth: 28/52   10:42:25  13390390kN
>>>>
>>>>(Fierz, Honolulu 14.11.2002)
>>>
>>>
>>>See here:
>>>
>>>http://www.beepworld.de/members37/computerschach/tests.htm
>>>
>>>Eduard
>>
>>hi eduard,
>>
>>as i wrote, i found this position on your page and still decided to ask here, as
>>there is not much info on your page :-)
>>e.g. you did not wait to see how long fritz would take to see black was winning.
>>
>>anyway, my next question is obvious: why can fritz7, arguably one of the best
>>programs around, not see something in many hours that others can see in a few
>>seconds??
>>
>>aloha
>>  martin
>
>I think that it is obvious
>Different pruning rules.
>
>I believe that fritz's pruning rules are not good for this pawn endgame.
>
>I read that Shredder does even worse and see a clear win for white because it
>use null move pruning for this pawn endgame(I guess that it believe that
>zugzwang is impossible when there are a lot of passed pawns and in this case it
>is simply wrong)
>
>Uri

Hello Uri, hella Martin!

Here the analysis by Deep Fritz 7 on P600, 128MB, TBS Cache = 8 MB:

Analysis by Deep Fritz 7:

1.a4!
  +-  (3.31)   Tiefe: 9/22   00:00:00  81kN
1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kc6 3.a5 f2+ 4.Kxf2
  +-  (3.19)   Tiefe: 10/22   00:00:00  94kN
1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kc6 3.a5 Kd5 4.c3 h2+ 5.Kxh2
  +-  (3.22)   Tiefe: 11/18   00:00:00  134kN
1.a4!
  +-  (3.50)   Tiefe: 12/22   00:00:00  177kN
1.a4!
  +-  (3.78)   Tiefe: 12/22   00:00:00  198kN
1.a4 Kc7 2.b4 Kc6 3.a5 Kd5 4.b5 Kd6 5.c3
  +-  (3.78)   Tiefe: 13/27   00:00:01  320kN, tb=50
1.a4--
  +-  (3.50)   Tiefe: 14/29   00:00:03  535kN, tb=154
1.a4 Kb7 2.b4 Kb6 3.a5+ Ka6 4.c4 Kb7 5.b5 Ka7 6.c5 Kb8 7.a6 Ka7 8.c6 Kb6 9.a7
Kxa7
  +-  (1.81)   Tiefe: 14/34   00:00:04  841kN, tb=193
1.b3
  +-  (1.84)   Tiefe: 14/34   00:00:04  897kN, tb=194
1.b3
  +-  (2.00)   Tiefe: 14/34   00:00:04  917kN, tb=195
1.b3
  +-  (2.31)   Tiefe: 14/34   00:00:04  938kN, tb=196
1.b3
  +-  (2.94)   Tiefe: 14/34   00:00:04  967kN, tb=197
1.b3 Kb7 2.b4 Kc7 3.c4 Kc6
  +-  (3.78)   Tiefe: 14/34   00:00:05  1113kN, tb=239
1.b3--
  +-  (3.50)   Tiefe: 15/26   00:00:06  1284kN, tb=460
1.b3 Kc7 2.a4 Kc6 3.a5 Kb7 4.b4
  +-  (1.81)   Tiefe: 15/43   00:00:12  2847kN, tb=630
1.b4
  +-  (1.84)   Tiefe: 15/43   00:00:14  3197kN, tb=1086
1.b4 Kc8 2.b5 Kc7 3.a3 Kb7 4.c4 Kb6 5.a4 Kb7
  +-  (1.81)   Tiefe: 16/29   00:00:15  3448kN, tb=1480
1.b4 Kc8 2.b5 Kc7 3.a3 Kb7 4.c4 Kb6 5.a4 Kb7
  +-  (1.81)   Tiefe: 17/29   00:00:18  3898kN, tb=2566
1.b4--
  +-  (1.53)   Tiefe: 18/40   00:00:23  4785kN, tb=4589
1.b4 Kc7 2.b5 Kd6 3.a4 Kc5 4.c3 Kb6 5.c4 Kb7
  ±  (1.28)   Tiefe: 18/44   00:00:29  6257kN, tb=5839
1.b4 Kc7 2.b5 Kd6 3.a4 Kc5 4.c3 Kb6 5.c4 Kb7
  ±  (1.28)   Tiefe: 19/42   00:00:38  8113kN, tb=10006
1.b4--
  ±  (1.00)   Tiefe: 20/40   00:00:50  10954kN, tb=16027
1.b4 Kc7 2.a4 Kb7 3.a5 Ka6 4.c4
  ±  (0.75)   Tiefe: 20/46   00:01:08  16297kN, tb=21750
1.b4--
  ²  (0.47)   Tiefe: 21/42   00:01:46  26594kN, tb=40905
1.b4 Kc7 2.a4 Kb6 3.a5+ Ka6 4.c4 Ka7 5.b5 Kb7 6.c5 Kb8 7.a6 Ka7
  -+  (-2.09)   Tiefe: 21/52   00:03:21  55513kN, tb=58684
1.b4 Kc7 2.a4 Kb6 3.a5+ Ka6 4.c4 Ka7 5.b5 Kb7 6.c5 Kb8 7.a6 Ka7
  -+  (-2.09)   Tiefe: 22/44   00:04:30  74382kN, tb=108757
1.b4 Kc7 2.a4 Kb6 3.a5+ Ka6 4.c4 Ka7 5.b5 Kb7 6.c5 Kb8 7.a6 Ka7
  -+  (-2.09)   Tiefe: 23/46   00:05:21  87950kN, tb=136697
1.b4--
  -+  (-2.37)   Tiefe: 24/55   00:07:38  130137kN, tb=234054
1.b4 Kc7 2.a4 Kb6 3.a5+ Ka6 4.c4 Ka7 5.b5 Kb7 6.c5 Kb8 7.a6 Ka7
  -+  (-5.25)   Tiefe: 24/55   00:12:12  218049kN, tb=416630

(Eduard, MyTown 15.11.2002)


Good, or?

Best,
Eduard




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.