Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 09:54:28 11/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2002 at 12:32:00, José Carlos wrote: >On November 16, 2002 at 12:23:49, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>On November 16, 2002 at 12:01:01, José Carlos wrote: >> >>>On November 16, 2002 at 11:45:27, Bob Durrett wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>I'm Confused. C, C++, C#. Which to Use? >>>> >>>>I have an old Visual C++ compiler which I purchased many years ago. But bulletins >>>>posted here seem to favor C, as opposed to C++ as if C is better than C++ for >>>>chess engine programming. >>>> >>>>Still trying to find the best C compiler to use for chess engine design on my >>>>Compaq 1 GHz 1GB RAM single-processor PC. >>>> >>>>Tried to download one but got error message saying NO! >>>> >>>>Yahoo! seems to find C++ compilers but not C compilers. >>>> >>>>Sorry for sounding like a child. : ( >>>> >>>>Bob D. >>> >>> Most (if not all) C++ copilers are also C compilers. Visual C++ is. >>> What languaje to choose is a matter of personal preference, because both are >>>equally good for chess programming. >> >>I wanted to be able to study Crafty and understand that Bob Hyatt programmed it >>in C and not C++. Similarly, the thesis on chess engines I'm looking at used C >>and not C++. The book I ordered on chess engines may be written in C too, I >>don't know. >> >>Well, all my gyrations are for nothing because I just looked at my bookcase at >>home and found a book [with a CD] titled "Teach Yourself C in 24 Hours" by Tony >>Zhang, SAMS Publishing, Copyright 1997. It's for Windows 95. Maybe the >>compiler on the CD will run on my Windows 98 machine. >> >>Oddly enough, the author says he compiled all the C programs using Microsoft >>Visual C++ version 1.5. Odd that he uses a Visual C++ compiler to compile a >>program written in the C language, but I guess that's what makes programming >>interesting? > > As I said, most (if not all) C++ compilers are also C compilers. Particularly, >Visual C++ is also Visual C. > C++ was born as an evolution of C. C is almost a subset of C++. > > José C. > I know this question is going to sound EXTREMELY DUMB, and will try the patience of the real programmers here, but: If I wish to follow Bob Hyatt's source code, written in C, then won't I get confused if I try to do it using Visual C? C and Visual C distinct? Bob D. > >>I guess I'll be up to speed on C in 24 hours? >> >>Bob D. >> >>[2nd Childhood, for sure!] >> >> >>> C is conceptually easier to learn. With C++ you can write conceptually more >>>complex programs with less complexity for you. Chess is simple enough for making >>>C++ conceptual advantage not important. >>> If you don't know any of both, just chose one (I'd suggest C because I like it >>>more, but no objective reason) and learn it. Only after you know the languaje, >>>start doing chess programming. If you start too soon, you'll get confused and >>>lose motivation. >>> My 2 cents. >>> >>> José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.