Author: Lex Loep
Date: 11:03:15 11/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2002 at 13:33:01, Tony Werten wrote: >On November 16, 2002 at 12:46:00, Lex Loep wrote: > >>On November 16, 2002 at 05:58:07, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >> >>>On November 16, 2002 at 02:41:51, Lex Loep wrote: >>> >>>>On November 16, 2002 at 00:13:10, Peter Skinner wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 15, 2002 at 19:13:51, Volker Richey wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>more informations at >>>>>> >>>>>>http://www.vrichey.de/cct5 >>>>>> >>>>>>Volker >>>>> >>>>>No authorized operator? >>>>> >>>>>The interface kibitzes.. >>>> >>>>Looking at the list of participants I see there is no competition >>>>for tiger. So what's the point in participating ? >>> >>>Well, have a look at Leiden 2002; ct had lost against points against the >>>winboarders and had to rank below 2 of these. >> >>What do you mean ? This is what I remember >>http://lokasoft.nl/uk/chess_tiger_15_in_dutch_open.htm >> >>Lex > >Maybe you can also remember the game you saw ? Tiger was very lucky against >XiniX. It was at most a draw for Tiger, maybe not even that. Tiger was very >lucky against Baron as well. > >Just looking at the endtable and saying "Tiger had no competition since it won" >is not very realistic. My observation is not only based on the endtable of the dutch open. CT15 went through a very long beta period in which thousands of games where played with CT15 coming on top. Or look at the SSDF list, the strongest amateur program is at place 21. For me this means there is still a large gap. Lex > >Tony > >> >>>OTOH, the cct5 tourney is ptobably not a good occasion for tiger to gain >>>publicity. >>>Everybody would expect a win of the tourney, which is however uncertain. So >>>,there is only room for possible disappoinment (imho). >>> >>>Uli >>> >>>> >>>>Lex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.