Author: Tony Werten
Date: 11:33:21 11/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2002 at 14:04:38, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 16, 2002 at 13:33:01, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On November 16, 2002 at 12:46:00, Lex Loep wrote: >> >>>On November 16, 2002 at 05:58:07, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>> >>>>On November 16, 2002 at 02:41:51, Lex Loep wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 16, 2002 at 00:13:10, Peter Skinner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 15, 2002 at 19:13:51, Volker Richey wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>more informations at >>>>>>> >>>>>>>http://www.vrichey.de/cct5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Volker >>>>>> >>>>>>No authorized operator? >>>>>> >>>>>>The interface kibitzes.. >>>>> >>>>>Looking at the list of participants I see there is no competition >>>>>for tiger. So what's the point in participating ? >>>> >>>>Well, have a look at Leiden 2002; ct had lost against points against the >>>>winboarders and had to rank below 2 of these. >>> >>>What do you mean ? This is what I remember >>>http://lokasoft.nl/uk/chess_tiger_15_in_dutch_open.htm >>> >>>Lex >> >>Maybe you can also remember the game you saw ? Tiger was very lucky against >>XiniX. It was at most a draw for Tiger, maybe not even that. Tiger was very >>lucky against Baron as well. >> >>Just looking at the endtable and saying "Tiger had no competition since it won" >>is not very realistic. >> >>Tony > >Can you define being lucky? XiniX had a much better position in the endgame but not much time left. It only took 6 seconds and produced the only move wich doesn't only give away the chance for a win but also gives away the draw. XiniX needs 8 seconds to come to the right move. Tony > >For me being lucky in case of no bugs is not a case when the opponent missed a >win because knowing to win won games is part of chess. > >I think that you can say that a program is lucky if the opponent outsearched it >when both sides do not understand the final position when later both programs >are surprised to find that the result is not what they evaluated. > >It happened to an old piece square table version of movei with no hash tables in >a game against Nejmet. > >Nejmet outsearched it and won a pawn only to find that the knight is trapped >so Nejmet lost the game. > >Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.