Author: Lex Loep
Date: 12:05:27 11/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2002 at 14:33:21, Tony Werten wrote: >On November 16, 2002 at 14:04:38, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 16, 2002 at 13:33:01, Tony Werten wrote: >> >>>On November 16, 2002 at 12:46:00, Lex Loep wrote: >>> >>>>On November 16, 2002 at 05:58:07, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 16, 2002 at 02:41:51, Lex Loep wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 16, 2002 at 00:13:10, Peter Skinner wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 15, 2002 at 19:13:51, Volker Richey wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>more informations at >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>http://www.vrichey.de/cct5 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Volker >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No authorized operator? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The interface kibitzes.. >>>>>> >>>>>>Looking at the list of participants I see there is no competition >>>>>>for tiger. So what's the point in participating ? >>>>> >>>>>Well, have a look at Leiden 2002; ct had lost against points against the >>>>>winboarders and had to rank below 2 of these. >>>> >>>>What do you mean ? This is what I remember >>>>http://lokasoft.nl/uk/chess_tiger_15_in_dutch_open.htm >>>> >>>>Lex >>> >>>Maybe you can also remember the game you saw ? Tiger was very lucky against >>>XiniX. It was at most a draw for Tiger, maybe not even that. Tiger was very >>>lucky against Baron as well. >>> >>>Just looking at the endtable and saying "Tiger had no competition since it won" >>>is not very realistic. >>> >>>Tony >> >>Can you define being lucky? > >XiniX had a much better position in the endgame but not much time left. It only >took 6 seconds and produced the only move wich doesn't only give away the chance >for a win but also gives away the draw. > >XiniX needs 8 seconds to come to the right move. > But then you may have lost the game on time. Timecontrol is part of the game and is no argument for being lucky. Lex >Tony > >> >>For me being lucky in case of no bugs is not a case when the opponent missed a >>win because knowing to win won games is part of chess. >> >>I think that you can say that a program is lucky if the opponent outsearched it >>when both sides do not understand the final position when later both programs >>are surprised to find that the result is not what they evaluated. >> >>It happened to an old piece square table version of movei with no hash tables in >>a game against Nejmet. >> >>Nejmet outsearched it and won a pawn only to find that the knight is trapped >>so Nejmet lost the game. >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.