Author: John Merlino
Date: 18:22:28 11/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2002 at 19:38:35, stuart taylor wrote: >Can I just ask you a simple quwstion. When you normally use CM9K, such as what >you were quoting here, do you go straight to the special Utzinger settings, >which I understand is the most reputable? If not, why not? (and if yes, I notice >you don't say so). [Or is that setting NOT the best for everything?] >S.Taylor Kurt Utzinger's settings appear to be very good for longer time controls, and PERHAPS analysis as well. However, being one of the developers for the game, I preferred to simply use the default settings, only using a larger (32MB) hash table for analysis. All of my results that I post use these settings, unless I specifically say otherwise. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.