Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 01:49:01 11/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2002 at 02:50:30, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>Yes, but that's not the point. If you loose this way, your opponent cannot say >>he didn't have any competition. > >I think we differ in opinion on that. I don't consider 'almost lost' >games to 'count' for this :) I think you are right. It's one thing to achieve a winning position, winning the game is something entirely different. >>Now, the bookmaker and operator said they did have a hard time, it's just the >>man selling this product that said there was no competition. ( Spoken like a >>true salesman, thus not quite correct) > >I think the issue is if Chess Tiger wins, then it's no big deal because >it's the expected result and the competition were 2nd rank engines >anyway (see discussions after NK). If it doesn't win then we get the >'OMG Chess Tiger didn't win! The amateurs are so strong! ChessTiger >sucks/plays too passive/...' stuff. Count on it. >No incentive to compete. Unless they see it as an oppotunity to promote their product. Afterall, MacLaren is still in formula 1 inspite of Ferrari doing loops around them :) -S. >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.