Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:36:20 09/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 1998 at 16:25:37, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>speed is not such an important matter if you evaluate very good... > >Speed is very important for Hiarcs 6. Hiarcs performs much better on a P200MMX >than on the 3x slower P90 it used here. That's why I don't thing the 10-10 >result is so good for Gandalf on the P200MMX. Statistically, this result will >put Gandalf some 60 or 70 points under Hiarcs 6 on the same platform. > >Enrique I did not referred to hiarcs. i know these things about hiarcs. therefore i always criticised the ssdf for testing genius on 486-66 meanwhile hiarcs got a 486-33... i meant gandalf. teh program does arround 27.000 nps on my 200 mhz machine and is not a fast-searcher from nps. it evaluates very good imo. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.