Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:05:42 11/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2002 at 02:23:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 16, 2002 at 23:31:35, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 15, 2002 at 18:15:43, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>> >>>I think that all the top programs of today can see Qe3 and can see Kh1 after >>>enough time and it was not the case in the time of deeper blue. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>Show me _any_ program that shows that Kf1 is a draw and Kf1 is not. >> >>Or show me any program that shows that Qe3 is a draw while any other move >>is not. >> >>There are none, so a program liking one or the other is simply lucky. This >>is an example of tactics, not strategy... > >We will have to agree to disagree. >I think that the job of good evaluation is also to consider chances for >perpetual check when you cannot see it by search. > >Uri That would be fine. But no commercial program evaluates "perpetual opportunities" in the evaluate code...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.