Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 20:07:07 11/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2002 at 20:37:16, James Grist wrote: >Well, >I've been analysing this variation for a few days now and despite you lot saying >it`s no good, I can`t find any decent way for Black to play. I reckon it`s a >great 'undiscovered' variation for White. > >1. e4 c5 >2. d4 cxd4 >3. Qxd4 Nc6 >4. Qa4 > >Someone said that 4...g6 and 4...d6 where good for black, but I've studied them >carefully and I'm pretty sure 5.Bb5 and 5.Qb3 (respectively) build White a >decent attack against any Black defence. If you post your analysis here, someone might look at even though it seems to have little to do with computer chess. Why do you think Bb5 and Qb3 are good? >Anyone disagree with this? Are you using any kind of chess software to help you? If so, what? Chessbase version 8.0 or Chess Assistant 7.0 would be great tools for you, but they are expensive. Someone here might suggest less expensive software tools which would also be helpful. It might even be possible to download something for free! Bob D. > > >I took a quick look at the chess thinkers forum and decided it`s best to post >here. Did you try rec.games.chess.analysis? It's better than nothing. Not much better, but still better. The fact is, as you say, the chess thinkers forum is NO GOOD for chess, or for anything else as far as I can see. There does not seem to be a really good moderated chess analysis forum in the English language. You could also try sending a letter to one of the chess masters at a chess magazine. Some of those magazines have columns where ideas are discussed. You could also start playing games with your new idea. It might be necessary to get a friend to agree to play the line, though. Try it from both sides. Develop a tree of ideas. Who knows, you could eventually become famous! : ) Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.